Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens — Manure management

Melanesia
4.87 million kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
3.93 million kg
in 2023
Melanesia rank
12th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
13th

Chickens — Manure management over time

  • Melanesia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
1.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M5.0M196119922023

How they compare

Melanesia currently reports 4.87 million kg against 3.93 million kg in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 946,180 kg.

That makes Melanesia's figure about 1.2 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Melanesia ranks 12th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 13th of 20 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Melanesia averaged higher in 5 and United Republic of Tanzania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Melanesia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 632,855 kg 755,541 kg 122,687 kg United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 943,030 kg 1.21 million kg 267,518 kg United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 2.01 million kg 1.51 million kg 500,022 kg Melanesia
1990s 2.91 million kg 2.18 million kg 726,545 kg Melanesia
2000s 3.67 million kg 2.58 million kg 1.08 million kg Melanesia
2010s 4.25 million kg 2.90 million kg 1.34 million kg Melanesia
2020s 4.61 million kg 3.73 million kg 884,250 kg Melanesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens — manure management, Melanesia or United Republic of Tanzania?
Melanesia, at 4.87 million kg against 3.93 million kg in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens — manure management between Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
946,180 kg, with Melanesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for chickens — manure management?
Melanesia ranks 12th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 13th of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/melanesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/melanesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).