Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens — Manure management

Middle Africa
11.26 million kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
3.93 million kg
in 2023
Middle Africa rank
10th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
13th

Chickens — Manure management over time

  • Middle Africa
  • United Republic of Tanzania
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M12.5M196119922023

How they compare

Middle Africa currently reports 11.26 million kg against 3.93 million kg in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 7.34 million kg.

That makes Middle Africa's figure about 2.9 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Middle Africa has been ahead every year.

Middle Africa ranks 10th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 13th of 20 groups.

Middle Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle Africa United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 1.47 million kg 755,541 kg 710,110 kg Middle Africa
1970s 2.37 million kg 1.21 million kg 1.16 million kg Middle Africa
1980s 3.34 million kg 1.51 million kg 1.83 million kg Middle Africa
1990s 5.01 million kg 2.18 million kg 2.83 million kg Middle Africa
2000s 6.00 million kg 2.58 million kg 3.42 million kg Middle Africa
2010s 8.84 million kg 2.90 million kg 5.94 million kg Middle Africa
2020s 10.26 million kg 3.73 million kg 6.53 million kg Middle Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens — manure management, Middle Africa or United Republic of Tanzania?
Middle Africa, at 11.26 million kg against 3.93 million kg in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens — manure management between Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
7.34 million kg, with Middle Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for chickens — manure management?
Middle Africa ranks 10th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 13th of 20 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/middle-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/middle-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).