Fiji vs Latvia: Chickens — Stocks
Chickens — Stocks over time
- Fiji
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 5.92 million An against 5.74 million An in Fiji, a difference of 179,000 An.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Fiji ranks 141st and Latvia ranks 140th of 209 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.40 million An | 4.63 million An | 1.23 million An | Latvia |
| 2000s | 4.16 million An | 3.99 million An | 169,400 An | Fiji |
| 2010s | 4.97 million An | 4.72 million An | 251,750 An | Fiji |
| 2020s | 5.63 million An | 5.79 million An | 160,500 An | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chickens — stocks, Fiji or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 5.92 million An against 5.74 million An in Fiji as of 2023.
- What is the difference in chickens — stocks between Fiji and Latvia?
- 179,000 An, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Latvia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Fiji and Latvia rank globally for chickens — stocks?
- Fiji ranks 141st and Latvia ranks 140th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).