Russian Federation vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens — Stocks

Russian Federation
4.99 million LSU
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
406,410 LSU
in 2023
Russian Federation rank
10th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
12th

Chickens — Stocks over time

  • Russian Federation
  • United Republic of Tanzania
02.0M4.0M6.0M196119922023

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 4.99 million LSU against 406,410 LSU in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 4.59 million LSU.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 12.3 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.

Russian Federation ranks 10th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 12th of 193 countries.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 4.72 million LSU 261,165 LSU 4.46 million LSU Russian Federation
2000s 3.41 million LSU 311,413 LSU 3.10 million LSU Russian Federation
2010s 4.60 million LSU 346,295 LSU 4.26 million LSU Russian Federation
2020s 4.89 million LSU 399,705 LSU 4.49 million LSU Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens — stocks, Russian Federation or United Republic of Tanzania?
Russian Federation, at 4.99 million LSU against 406,410 LSU in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens — stocks between Russian Federation and United Republic of Tanzania?
4.59 million LSU, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and United Republic of Tanzania?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Russian Federation and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for chickens — stocks?
Russian Federation ranks 10th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 12th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russian Federation vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-stocks/russian-federation-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-stocks/russian-federation-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Russian Federation vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens — Stocks
Unit
LSU
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
244 places, 13,956 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Patterns domain of FAOSTAT contains data on livestock numbers, shares of major livestock species and densities of livestock units in the agricultural land area. Values are calculated using Livestock Units (LSU), which facilitate aggregating information for different livestock types. Data are available by country, with global coverage, for the period 1961 to the most recent year available with annual updates. This methodology applies the LSU coefficients reported in the "Guidelines for the preparation of livestock sector reviews" (FAO, 2011). From this publication, LSU coefficients are computed by livestock type and by country. The reference unit used for the calculation of livestock units (=1 LSU) is the grazing equivalent of one adult dairy cow producing 3000 kg of milk annually, fed without additional concentrated foodstuffs. FAOSTAT agri-environmental indicators on livestock patterns closely follow the structure of the indicators in EUROSTAT.