Australia and New Zealand vs Belarus: Children moderately or severely wasted
Australia and New Zealand
8.9
in 2024
Belarus
5.2
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
58th
Belarus rank
61st
Children moderately or severely wasted over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Belarus
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 8.9 against 5.2 in Belarus, a difference of 3.7.
That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.7 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Belarus ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 58th and Belarus ranks 61st of 67 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Belarus in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.6 | 9.8 | 7.2 | Belarus |
| 2010s | 7.5 | 7 | 0.5 | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2020s | 8.07 | 5.72 | 2.35 | Australia and New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher children moderately or severely wasted, Australia and New Zealand or Belarus?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 8.9 against 5.2 in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in children moderately or severely wasted between Australia and New Zealand and Belarus?
- 3.7, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Belarus?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Belarus rank globally for children moderately or severely wasted?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 58th and Belarus ranks 61st of 67 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Children moderately or severely wasted (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.