Australia and New Zealand vs Jamaica: Children moderately or severely wasted
Australia and New Zealand
8.9 num th
in 2024
Jamaica
5.7 num th
in 2018
Australia and New Zealand rank
74th
Jamaica rank
75th
Children moderately or severely wasted over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Jamaica
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 8.9 num th against 5.7 num th in Jamaica, a difference of 3.2 num th.
That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.6 times Jamaica's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Jamaica ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 74th and Jamaica ranks 75th of 84 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.41 num th | 8.01 num th | 5.6 num th | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 5.84 num th | 7.22 num th | 1.38 num th | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher children moderately or severely wasted, Australia and New Zealand or Jamaica?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 8.9 num th against 5.7 num th in Jamaica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in children moderately or severely wasted between Australia and New Zealand and Jamaica?
- 3.2 num th, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Jamaica?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Jamaica rank globally for children moderately or severely wasted?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 74th and Jamaica ranks 75th of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Children moderately or severely wasted (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.