Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) vs Russian Federation: Children moderately or severely wasted
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
134.1
in 2024
Russian Federation
233.5
in 2005
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) rank
24th
Russian Federation rank
26th
Children moderately or severely wasted over time
- Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 233.5 against 134.1 in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand), a difference of 99.4.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.7 times Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand)'s.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.
Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 24th and Russian Federation ranks 26th of 27 groups.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher children moderately or severely wasted, Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 233.5 against 134.1 in Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) as of 2005.
- What is the difference in children moderately or severely wasted between Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Russian Federation?
- 99.4, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Russian Federation?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2005.
- How do Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) and Russian Federation rank globally for children moderately or severely wasted?
- Oceania (exc. Australia and New Zealand) ranks 24th and Russian Federation ranks 26th of 27 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Children moderately or severely wasted (thousands). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.