Cabo Verde vs Latvia: China — Fibreboard — Import Quantity
China — Fibreboard — Import Quantity over time
- Cabo Verde
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 65 m3 against 64 m3 in Cabo Verde, a difference of 1 m3.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 132nd and Latvia ranks 131st of 163 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.5 m3 | 240 m3 | 217.5 m3 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 23.86 m3 | 179.29 m3 | 155.43 m3 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher china — fibreboard — import quantity, Cabo Verde or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 65 m3 against 64 m3 in Cabo Verde as of 2017.
- What is the difference in china — fibreboard — import quantity between Cabo Verde and Latvia?
- 1 m3, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Latvia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Cabo Verde and Latvia rank globally for china — fibreboard — import quantity?
- Cabo Verde ranks 132nd and Latvia ranks 131st of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as China — Fibreboard — Import Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The database contains data on the bilateral trade flows in roundwood, primary wood and paper products for all countries and territories in the world. The main types of primary forest products included in are: roundwood, sawnwood, wood-based panels, pulp, and paper and paperboard. These products are detailed further. The definitions are available. More detailed information on wood products, including definitions, can be found at: https://www.fao.org/forestry/statistics/80572/en/