Australia vs United Republic of Tanzania: China — Industrial roundwood, non-coniferous non-tropical

Australia
1.14 million m3
in 2018
United Republic of Tanzania
675 m3
in 2018
Australia rank
4th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
7th

China — Industrial roundwood, non-coniferous non-tropical over time

  • Australia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M125.0M199720072018

How they compare

Australia currently reports 1.14 million m3 against 675 m3 in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 1.14 million m3.

That makes Australia's figure about 1,686.6 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 4th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 100 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 5,446 m3 943.5 m3 4,503 m3 Australia
2000s 16.35 million m3 5,731 m3 16.34 million m3 Australia
2010s 519,287 m3 1,352 m3 517,935 m3 Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher china — industrial roundwood, non-coniferous non-tropical, Australia or United Republic of Tanzania?
Australia, at 1.14 million m3 against 675 m3 in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2018.
What is the difference in china — industrial roundwood, non-coniferous non-tropical between Australia and United Republic of Tanzania?
1.14 million m3, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and United Republic of Tanzania?
17 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2018.
How do Australia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for china — industrial roundwood, non-coniferous non-tropical?
Australia ranks 4th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 100 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as China — Industrial roundwood, non-coniferous non-tropical (export/import) — Export Quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs United Republic of Tanzania: China — Industrial roundwood, non-coniferous non-tropical. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/china-industrial-roundwood-non-coniferous-non-tropical-export-import-export-quantity/australia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/china-industrial-roundwood-non-coniferous-non-tropical-export-import-export-quantity/australia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Australia vs United Republic of Tanzania: China — Industrial roundwood, non-coniferous non-tropical</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
China — Industrial roundwood, non-coniferous non-tropical (export/import) — Export Quantity
Unit
m3
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
108 places, 1,604 data points, 1997–2018
Last refreshed

The database contains data on the bilateral trade flows in roundwood, primary wood and paper products for all countries and territories in the world. The main types of primary forest products included in are: roundwood, sawnwood, wood-based panels, pulp, and paper and paperboard. These products are detailed further. The definitions are available. More detailed information on wood products, including definitions, can be found at: https://www.fao.org/forestry/statistics/80572/en/