Nigeria vs Tunisia: CO2 emissions from cement production

Nigeria
2,244 thousand metric tons
in 2009
Tunisia
3,990 thousand metric tons
in 2009
Nigeria rank
7th
Tunisia rank
5th

CO2 emissions from cement production over time

  • Nigeria
  • Tunisia
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196019842009

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 3,990 thousand metric tons against 2,244 thousand metric tons in Nigeria, a difference of 1,746 thousand metric tons.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.8 times Nigeria's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Tunisia ahead.

Nigeria ranks 7th and Tunisia ranks 5th of 51 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Nigeria averaged higher in 3 and Tunisia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nigeria Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 305.09 thousand metric tons 220.75 thousand metric tons 84.34 thousand metric tons Nigeria
1970s 607.26 thousand metric tons 336.26 thousand metric tons 270.99 thousand metric tons Nigeria
1980s 1,631 thousand metric tons 1,354 thousand metric tons 276.49 thousand metric tons Nigeria
1990s 1,456 thousand metric tons 2,173 thousand metric tons 717.26 thousand metric tons Tunisia
2000s 1,586 thousand metric tons 3,308 thousand metric tons 1,722 thousand metric tons Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co2 emissions from cement production, Nigeria or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 3,990 thousand metric tons against 2,244 thousand metric tons in Nigeria as of 2009.
What is the difference in co2 emissions from cement production between Nigeria and Tunisia?
1,746 thousand metric tons, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Tunisia?
50 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2009.
How do Nigeria and Tunisia rank globally for co2 emissions from cement production?
Nigeria ranks 7th and Tunisia ranks 5th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site, published as CO2 emissions from cement production (thousand metric tons). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nigeria vs Tunisia: CO2 emissions from cement production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-cement-production-thousand-metric-tons/nigeria/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-cement-production-thousand-metric-tons/nigeria/tunisia/">Nigeria vs Tunisia: CO2 emissions from cement production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO2 emissions from cement production (thousand metric tons)
Unit
thousand metric tons
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 2,733 data points, 1960–2009
Last refreshed

Carbon dioxide emissions from cement production refer mainly to emissions during cement production. Cement production is a multi-step process and CO2 is actually released from klinker production during the cement production process. The U.S. Department of Energy’s carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC) calculates annual anthropogenic emissions from data on fossil fuel consumption (from the United Nations Statistics Division’s World Energy Data Set) and world cement manufacturing (from the U.S. Bureau of Mine’s Cement Manufacturing Data Set). Carbon dioxide emissions, often calculated and reported as elemental carbon, were converted to actual carbon dioxide mass by multiplying them by 3.664 (the ratio of the mass of carbon to that of carbon dioxide). Although estimates of global carbon dioxide emissions are probably accurate within 10 percent (as calculated from global average file chemistry and use), country estimates may have larger error bounds. Trends estimated from a consistent time series tend to be more accurate than individual values. Each year the CDIAC recalculates the entire time series since 1949, incorporating recent findings and corrections. Estimates exclude fuels supplied to ships and aircraft in international transport because of the difficulty of apportioning he fuels among benefitting countries. The ratio of carbon dioxide per unit of energy shows carbon intensity, which is the amount of carbon dioxide emitted as a result of using one unit of energy in the process of production.