Sub-Saharan Africa vs Tunisia: CO2 emissions from cement production

Sub-Saharan Africa
21,941 thousand metric tons
in 2009
Tunisia
3,990 thousand metric tons
in 2009
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
3rd
Tunisia rank
5th

CO2 emissions from cement production over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Tunisia
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196019842009

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 21,941 thousand metric tons against 3,990 thousand metric tons in Tunisia, a difference of 17,951 thousand metric tons.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 5.5 times Tunisia's.

Across all 50 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa has been ahead every year.

Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 3rd and Tunisia ranks 5th of 6 groups.

Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 4,363 thousand metric tons 220.75 thousand metric tons 4,142 thousand metric tons Sub-Saharan Africa
1970s 8,532 thousand metric tons 336.26 thousand metric tons 8,196 thousand metric tons Sub-Saharan Africa
1980s 10,058 thousand metric tons 1,354 thousand metric tons 8,704 thousand metric tons Sub-Saharan Africa
1990s 11,499 thousand metric tons 2,173 thousand metric tons 9,326 thousand metric tons Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 17,263 thousand metric tons 3,308 thousand metric tons 13,955 thousand metric tons Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co2 emissions from cement production, Sub-Saharan Africa or Tunisia?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 21,941 thousand metric tons against 3,990 thousand metric tons in Tunisia as of 2009.
What is the difference in co2 emissions from cement production between Sub-Saharan Africa and Tunisia?
17,951 thousand metric tons, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Tunisia?
50 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2009.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa and Tunisia rank globally for co2 emissions from cement production?
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 3rd and Tunisia ranks 5th of 6 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site, published as CO2 emissions from cement production (thousand metric tons). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa vs Tunisia: CO2 emissions from cement production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-cement-production-thousand-metric-tons/sub-saharan-africa/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-cement-production-thousand-metric-tons/sub-saharan-africa/tunisia/">Sub-Saharan Africa vs Tunisia: CO2 emissions from cement production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO2 emissions from cement production (thousand metric tons)
Unit
thousand metric tons
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 2,733 data points, 1960–2009
Last refreshed

Carbon dioxide emissions from cement production refer mainly to emissions during cement production. Cement production is a multi-step process and CO2 is actually released from klinker production during the cement production process. The U.S. Department of Energy’s carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC) calculates annual anthropogenic emissions from data on fossil fuel consumption (from the United Nations Statistics Division’s World Energy Data Set) and world cement manufacturing (from the U.S. Bureau of Mine’s Cement Manufacturing Data Set). Carbon dioxide emissions, often calculated and reported as elemental carbon, were converted to actual carbon dioxide mass by multiplying them by 3.664 (the ratio of the mass of carbon to that of carbon dioxide). Although estimates of global carbon dioxide emissions are probably accurate within 10 percent (as calculated from global average file chemistry and use), country estimates may have larger error bounds. Trends estimated from a consistent time series tend to be more accurate than individual values. Each year the CDIAC recalculates the entire time series since 1949, incorporating recent findings and corrections. Estimates exclude fuels supplied to ships and aircraft in international transport because of the difficulty of apportioning he fuels among benefitting countries. The ratio of carbon dioxide per unit of energy shows carbon intensity, which is the amount of carbon dioxide emitted as a result of using one unit of energy in the process of production.