Angola vs Morocco: CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total

Angola
26,655 thousand metric tons
in 2009
Morocco
48,815 thousand metric tons
in 2009
Angola rank
7th
Morocco rank
6th

CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total over time

  • Angola
  • Morocco
020.0k40.0k60.0k196019842009

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 48,815 thousand metric tons against 26,655 thousand metric tons in Angola, a difference of 22,160 thousand metric tons.

That makes Morocco's figure about 1.8 times Angola's.

Across all 50 years both countries report, Morocco has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 7th and Morocco ranks 6th of 51 countries.

Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Morocco Difference Ahead
1960s 1,276 thousand metric tons 4,548 thousand metric tons 3,272 thousand metric tons Morocco
1970s 4,341 thousand metric tons 10,872 thousand metric tons 6,531 thousand metric tons Morocco
1980s 5,072 thousand metric tons 18,543 thousand metric tons 13,471 thousand metric tons Morocco
1990s 6,826 thousand metric tons 29,104 thousand metric tons 22,278 thousand metric tons Morocco
2000s 17,905 thousand metric tons 43,293 thousand metric tons 25,388 thousand metric tons Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total, Angola or Morocco?
Morocco, at 48,815 thousand metric tons against 26,655 thousand metric tons in Angola as of 2009.
What is the difference in co2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total between Angola and Morocco?
22,160 thousand metric tons, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Morocco?
50 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2009.
How do Angola and Morocco rank globally for co2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total?
Angola ranks 7th and Morocco ranks 6th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site, published as CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total (thousand metric tons). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Morocco: CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-total-thousand-metric-tons/angola/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-total-thousand-metric-tons/angola/morocco/">Angola vs Morocco: CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total (thousand metric tons)
Unit
thousand metric tons
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 2,749 data points, 1960–2009
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel is any hydrocarbon deposit that can be burned for heat or power, such as petroleum, coal, and natural gas. This is the sum total of all fossil fuel emissions (solid fuel consumption, liquid fuel consumption, gas fuel consumption, cement production and gas flaring). The U.S. Department of Energy’s carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC) calculates annual anthropogenic emissions from data on fossil fuel consumption (from the United Nations Statistics Division’s World Energy Data Set) and world cement manufacturing (from the U.S. Bureau of Mine’s Cement Manufacturing Data Set). Carbon dioxide emissions, often calculated and reported as elemental carbon, were converted to actual carbon dioxide mass by multiplying them by 3.664 (the ratio of the mass of carbon to that of carbon dioxide). Although estimates of global carbon dioxide emissions are probably accurate within 10 percent (as calculated from global average file chemistry and use), country estimates may have larger error bounds. Trends estimated from a consistent time series tend to be more accurate than individual values. Each year the CDIAC recalculates the entire time series since 1949, incorporating recent findings and corrections. Estimates exclude fuels supplied to ships and aircraft in international transport because of the difficulty of apportioning he fuels among benefitting countries. The ratio of carbon dioxide per unit of energy shows carbon intensity, which is the amount of carbon dioxide emitted as a result of using one unit of energy in the process of production.