Angola vs Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria: CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total
CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total over time
- Angola
- Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria
How they compare
Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria currently reports 160,809 thousand metric tons against 26,655 thousand metric tons in Angola, a difference of 134,154 thousand metric tons.
That makes Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria's figure about 6.0 times Angola's.
Across all 50 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 7th and Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria ranks 6th of 51 countries.
Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,276 thousand metric tons | 33,474 thousand metric tons | 32,198 thousand metric tons | Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria |
| 1970s | 4,341 thousand metric tons | 66,150 thousand metric tons | 61,809 thousand metric tons | Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria |
| 1980s | 5,072 thousand metric tons | 78,355 thousand metric tons | 73,283 thousand metric tons | Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria |
| 1990s | 6,826 thousand metric tons | 94,759 thousand metric tons | 87,933 thousand metric tons | Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria |
| 2000s | 17,905 thousand metric tons | 137,368 thousand metric tons | 119,463 thousand metric tons | Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher co2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total, Angola or Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria?
- Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria, at 160,809 thousand metric tons against 26,655 thousand metric tons in Angola as of 2009.
- What is the difference in co2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total between Angola and Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria?
- 134,154 thousand metric tons, with Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria?
- 50 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2009.
- How do Angola and Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria rank globally for co2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total?
- Angola ranks 7th and Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria ranks 6th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site, published as CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total (thousand metric tons). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fossil fuel is any hydrocarbon deposit that can be burned for heat or power, such as petroleum, coal, and natural gas. This is the sum total of all fossil fuel emissions (solid fuel consumption, liquid fuel consumption, gas fuel consumption, cement production and gas flaring). The U.S. Department of Energy’s carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC) calculates annual anthropogenic emissions from data on fossil fuel consumption (from the United Nations Statistics Division’s World Energy Data Set) and world cement manufacturing (from the U.S. Bureau of Mine’s Cement Manufacturing Data Set). Carbon dioxide emissions, often calculated and reported as elemental carbon, were converted to actual carbon dioxide mass by multiplying them by 3.664 (the ratio of the mass of carbon to that of carbon dioxide). Although estimates of global carbon dioxide emissions are probably accurate within 10 percent (as calculated from global average file chemistry and use), country estimates may have larger error bounds. Trends estimated from a consistent time series tend to be more accurate than individual values. Each year the CDIAC recalculates the entire time series since 1949, incorporating recent findings and corrections. Estimates exclude fuels supplied to ships and aircraft in international transport because of the difficulty of apportioning he fuels among benefitting countries. The ratio of carbon dioxide per unit of energy shows carbon intensity, which is the amount of carbon dioxide emitted as a result of using one unit of energy in the process of production.