Botswana vs Uganda: CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total

Botswana
4,430 thousand metric tons
in 2009
Uganda
3,480 thousand metric tons
in 2009
Botswana rank
19th
Uganda rank
22nd

CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total over time

  • Botswana
  • Uganda
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196019842009

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 4,430 thousand metric tons against 3,480 thousand metric tons in Uganda, a difference of 950 thousand metric tons.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.3 times Uganda's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 38 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Uganda ahead.

Botswana ranks 19th and Uganda ranks 22nd of 51 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 3 and Uganda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Uganda Difference Ahead
1970s 437.29 thousand metric tons 1,008 thousand metric tons 570.68 thousand metric tons Uganda
1980s 1,258 thousand metric tons 666.29 thousand metric tons 591.85 thousand metric tons Botswana
1990s 3,190 thousand metric tons 1,008 thousand metric tons 2,181 thousand metric tons Botswana
2000s 4,506 thousand metric tons 2,309 thousand metric tons 2,197 thousand metric tons Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total, Botswana or Uganda?
Botswana, at 4,430 thousand metric tons against 3,480 thousand metric tons in Uganda as of 2009.
What is the difference in co2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total between Botswana and Uganda?
950 thousand metric tons, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Uganda?
38 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2009.
How do Botswana and Uganda rank globally for co2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total?
Botswana ranks 19th and Uganda ranks 22nd of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site, published as CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total (thousand metric tons). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Uganda: CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-total-thousand-metric-tons/botswana/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-total-thousand-metric-tons/botswana/uganda/">Botswana vs Uganda: CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total (thousand metric tons)
Unit
thousand metric tons
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 2,749 data points, 1960–2009
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel is any hydrocarbon deposit that can be burned for heat or power, such as petroleum, coal, and natural gas. This is the sum total of all fossil fuel emissions (solid fuel consumption, liquid fuel consumption, gas fuel consumption, cement production and gas flaring). The U.S. Department of Energy’s carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC) calculates annual anthropogenic emissions from data on fossil fuel consumption (from the United Nations Statistics Division’s World Energy Data Set) and world cement manufacturing (from the U.S. Bureau of Mine’s Cement Manufacturing Data Set). Carbon dioxide emissions, often calculated and reported as elemental carbon, were converted to actual carbon dioxide mass by multiplying them by 3.664 (the ratio of the mass of carbon to that of carbon dioxide). Although estimates of global carbon dioxide emissions are probably accurate within 10 percent (as calculated from global average file chemistry and use), country estimates may have larger error bounds. Trends estimated from a consistent time series tend to be more accurate than individual values. Each year the CDIAC recalculates the entire time series since 1949, incorporating recent findings and corrections. Estimates exclude fuels supplied to ships and aircraft in international transport because of the difficulty of apportioning he fuels among benefitting countries. The ratio of carbon dioxide per unit of energy shows carbon intensity, which is the amount of carbon dioxide emitted as a result of using one unit of energy in the process of production.