Congo vs Mauritania: CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total

Congo
1,944 thousand metric tons
in 2009
Mauritania
2,076 thousand metric tons
in 2009
Congo rank
27th
Mauritania rank
25th

CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total over time

  • Congo
  • Mauritania
01.0k2.0k3.0k196019842009

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 2,076 thousand metric tons against 1,944 thousand metric tons in Congo, a difference of 132 thousand metric tons.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 27th and Mauritania ranks 25th of 51 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Mauritania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 306.19 thousand metric tons 140.08 thousand metric tons 166.12 thousand metric tons Congo
1970s 825.44 thousand metric tons 500.18 thousand metric tons 325.26 thousand metric tons Congo
1980s 1,119 thousand metric tons 1,437 thousand metric tons 318.66 thousand metric tons Mauritania
1990s 1,494 thousand metric tons 2,574 thousand metric tons 1,080 thousand metric tons Mauritania
2000s 1,318 thousand metric tons 1,655 thousand metric tons 336.63 thousand metric tons Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total, Congo or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 2,076 thousand metric tons against 1,944 thousand metric tons in Congo as of 2009.
What is the difference in co2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total between Congo and Mauritania?
132 thousand metric tons, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mauritania?
50 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2009.
How do Congo and Mauritania rank globally for co2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total?
Congo ranks 27th and Mauritania ranks 25th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site, published as CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total (thousand metric tons). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Mauritania: CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-total-thousand-metric-tons/congo-rep/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-total-thousand-metric-tons/congo-rep/mauritania/">Congo vs Mauritania: CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total (thousand metric tons)
Unit
thousand metric tons
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 2,749 data points, 1960–2009
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel is any hydrocarbon deposit that can be burned for heat or power, such as petroleum, coal, and natural gas. This is the sum total of all fossil fuel emissions (solid fuel consumption, liquid fuel consumption, gas fuel consumption, cement production and gas flaring). The U.S. Department of Energy’s carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC) calculates annual anthropogenic emissions from data on fossil fuel consumption (from the United Nations Statistics Division’s World Energy Data Set) and world cement manufacturing (from the U.S. Bureau of Mine’s Cement Manufacturing Data Set). Carbon dioxide emissions, often calculated and reported as elemental carbon, were converted to actual carbon dioxide mass by multiplying them by 3.664 (the ratio of the mass of carbon to that of carbon dioxide). Although estimates of global carbon dioxide emissions are probably accurate within 10 percent (as calculated from global average file chemistry and use), country estimates may have larger error bounds. Trends estimated from a consistent time series tend to be more accurate than individual values. Each year the CDIAC recalculates the entire time series since 1949, incorporating recent findings and corrections. Estimates exclude fuels supplied to ships and aircraft in international transport because of the difficulty of apportioning he fuels among benefitting countries. The ratio of carbon dioxide per unit of energy shows carbon intensity, which is the amount of carbon dioxide emitted as a result of using one unit of energy in the process of production.