Eswatini vs Rwanda: CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total

Eswatini
1,023 thousand metric tons
in 2009
Rwanda
726.07 thousand metric tons
in 2009
Eswatini rank
36th
Rwanda rank
38th

CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total over time

  • Eswatini
  • Rwanda
02505007501.0k1.2k196019842009

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 1,023 thousand metric tons against 726.07 thousand metric tons in Rwanda, a difference of 296.93 thousand metric tons.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.4 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Rwanda ahead.

Eswatini ranks 36th and Rwanda ranks 38th of 51 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 183.96 thousand metric tons 47.06 thousand metric tons 136.9 thousand metric tons Eswatini
1970s 372.93 thousand metric tons 162.81 thousand metric tons 210.12 thousand metric tons Eswatini
1980s 415.1 thousand metric tons 625.22 thousand metric tons 210.12 thousand metric tons Rwanda
1990s 608.36 thousand metric tons 642.09 thousand metric tons 33.74 thousand metric tons Rwanda
2000s 1,074 thousand metric tons 696 thousand metric tons 378.44 thousand metric tons Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total, Eswatini or Rwanda?
Eswatini, at 1,023 thousand metric tons against 726.07 thousand metric tons in Rwanda as of 2009.
What is the difference in co2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total between Eswatini and Rwanda?
296.93 thousand metric tons, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Rwanda?
46 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2009.
How do Eswatini and Rwanda rank globally for co2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total?
Eswatini ranks 36th and Rwanda ranks 38th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site, published as CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total (thousand metric tons). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Rwanda: CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-total-thousand-metric-tons/eswatini/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-total-thousand-metric-tons/eswatini/rwanda/">Eswatini vs Rwanda: CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total (thousand metric tons)
Unit
thousand metric tons
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 2,749 data points, 1960–2009
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel is any hydrocarbon deposit that can be burned for heat or power, such as petroleum, coal, and natural gas. This is the sum total of all fossil fuel emissions (solid fuel consumption, liquid fuel consumption, gas fuel consumption, cement production and gas flaring). The U.S. Department of Energy’s carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC) calculates annual anthropogenic emissions from data on fossil fuel consumption (from the United Nations Statistics Division’s World Energy Data Set) and world cement manufacturing (from the U.S. Bureau of Mine’s Cement Manufacturing Data Set). Carbon dioxide emissions, often calculated and reported as elemental carbon, were converted to actual carbon dioxide mass by multiplying them by 3.664 (the ratio of the mass of carbon to that of carbon dioxide). Although estimates of global carbon dioxide emissions are probably accurate within 10 percent (as calculated from global average file chemistry and use), country estimates may have larger error bounds. Trends estimated from a consistent time series tend to be more accurate than individual values. Each year the CDIAC recalculates the entire time series since 1949, incorporating recent findings and corrections. Estimates exclude fuels supplied to ships and aircraft in international transport because of the difficulty of apportioning he fuels among benefitting countries. The ratio of carbon dioxide per unit of energy shows carbon intensity, which is the amount of carbon dioxide emitted as a result of using one unit of energy in the process of production.