Mauritania vs Zambia: CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total

Mauritania
2,076 thousand metric tons
in 2009
Zambia
1,984 thousand metric tons
in 2009
Mauritania rank
25th
Zambia rank
26th

CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total over time

  • Mauritania
  • Zambia
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196019842009

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 2,076 thousand metric tons against 1,984 thousand metric tons in Zambia, a difference of 92 thousand metric tons.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Zambia ahead.

Mauritania ranks 25th and Zambia ranks 26th of 51 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 194.35 thousand metric tons 4,056 thousand metric tons 3,862 thousand metric tons Zambia
1970s 500.18 thousand metric tons 3,935 thousand metric tons 3,435 thousand metric tons Zambia
1980s 1,437 thousand metric tons 3,060 thousand metric tons 1,623 thousand metric tons Zambia
1990s 2,574 thousand metric tons 2,279 thousand metric tons 294.83 thousand metric tons Mauritania
2000s 1,655 thousand metric tons 2,008 thousand metric tons 353.13 thousand metric tons Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total, Mauritania or Zambia?
Mauritania, at 2,076 thousand metric tons against 1,984 thousand metric tons in Zambia as of 2009.
What is the difference in co2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total between Mauritania and Zambia?
92 thousand metric tons, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Zambia?
46 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2009.
How do Mauritania and Zambia rank globally for co2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total?
Mauritania ranks 25th and Zambia ranks 26th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site, published as CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total (thousand metric tons). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Zambia: CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-total-thousand-metric-tons/mauritania/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-total-thousand-metric-tons/mauritania/zambia/">Mauritania vs Zambia: CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total (thousand metric tons)
Unit
thousand metric tons
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 2,749 data points, 1960–2009
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel is any hydrocarbon deposit that can be burned for heat or power, such as petroleum, coal, and natural gas. This is the sum total of all fossil fuel emissions (solid fuel consumption, liquid fuel consumption, gas fuel consumption, cement production and gas flaring). The U.S. Department of Energy’s carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC) calculates annual anthropogenic emissions from data on fossil fuel consumption (from the United Nations Statistics Division’s World Energy Data Set) and world cement manufacturing (from the U.S. Bureau of Mine’s Cement Manufacturing Data Set). Carbon dioxide emissions, often calculated and reported as elemental carbon, were converted to actual carbon dioxide mass by multiplying them by 3.664 (the ratio of the mass of carbon to that of carbon dioxide). Although estimates of global carbon dioxide emissions are probably accurate within 10 percent (as calculated from global average file chemistry and use), country estimates may have larger error bounds. Trends estimated from a consistent time series tend to be more accurate than individual values. Each year the CDIAC recalculates the entire time series since 1949, incorporating recent findings and corrections. Estimates exclude fuels supplied to ships and aircraft in international transport because of the difficulty of apportioning he fuels among benefitting countries. The ratio of carbon dioxide per unit of energy shows carbon intensity, which is the amount of carbon dioxide emitted as a result of using one unit of energy in the process of production.