South Africa vs Sub-Saharan Africa: CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total

South Africa
499,016 thousand metric tons
in 2009
Sub-Saharan Africa
742,674 thousand metric tons
in 2009
South Africa rank
1st
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
2nd

CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total over time

  • South Africa
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196019842009

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 742,674 thousand metric tons against 499,016 thousand metric tons in South Africa, a difference of 243,658 thousand metric tons.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 1.5 times South Africa's.

Across all 50 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa has been ahead every year.

South Africa ranks 1st and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 2nd of 51 countries.

Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 120,727 thousand metric tons 165,130 thousand metric tons 44,403 thousand metric tons Sub-Saharan Africa
1970s 183,960 thousand metric tons 303,043 thousand metric tons 119,083 thousand metric tons Sub-Saharan Africa
1980s 304,301 thousand metric tons 456,298 thousand metric tons 151,997 thousand metric tons Sub-Saharan Africa
1990s 353,286 thousand metric tons 503,808 thousand metric tons 150,522 thousand metric tons Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 411,556 thousand metric tons 650,376 thousand metric tons 238,819 thousand metric tons Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total, South Africa or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 742,674 thousand metric tons against 499,016 thousand metric tons in South Africa as of 2009.
What is the difference in co2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total between South Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa?
243,658 thousand metric tons, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa?
50 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2009.
How do South Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for co2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total?
South Africa ranks 1st and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 2nd of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site, published as CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total (thousand metric tons). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Sub-Saharan Africa: CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-total-thousand-metric-tons/south-africa/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-total-thousand-metric-tons/south-africa/sub-saharan-africa/">South Africa vs Sub-Saharan Africa: CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total (thousand metric tons)
Unit
thousand metric tons
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 2,749 data points, 1960–2009
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel is any hydrocarbon deposit that can be burned for heat or power, such as petroleum, coal, and natural gas. This is the sum total of all fossil fuel emissions (solid fuel consumption, liquid fuel consumption, gas fuel consumption, cement production and gas flaring). The U.S. Department of Energy’s carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC) calculates annual anthropogenic emissions from data on fossil fuel consumption (from the United Nations Statistics Division’s World Energy Data Set) and world cement manufacturing (from the U.S. Bureau of Mine’s Cement Manufacturing Data Set). Carbon dioxide emissions, often calculated and reported as elemental carbon, were converted to actual carbon dioxide mass by multiplying them by 3.664 (the ratio of the mass of carbon to that of carbon dioxide). Although estimates of global carbon dioxide emissions are probably accurate within 10 percent (as calculated from global average file chemistry and use), country estimates may have larger error bounds. Trends estimated from a consistent time series tend to be more accurate than individual values. Each year the CDIAC recalculates the entire time series since 1949, incorporating recent findings and corrections. Estimates exclude fuels supplied to ships and aircraft in international transport because of the difficulty of apportioning he fuels among benefitting countries. The ratio of carbon dioxide per unit of energy shows carbon intensity, which is the amount of carbon dioxide emitted as a result of using one unit of energy in the process of production.