Sudan vs Zimbabwe: CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total

Sudan
14,338 thousand metric tons
in 2009
Zimbabwe
8,914 thousand metric tons
in 2009
Sudan rank
9th
Zimbabwe rank
11th

CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total over time

  • Sudan
  • Zimbabwe
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196019842009

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 14,338 thousand metric tons against 8,914 thousand metric tons in Zimbabwe, a difference of 5,424 thousand metric tons.

That makes Sudan's figure about 1.6 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 46 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Sudan ranks 9th and Zimbabwe ranks 11th of 51 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sudan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 2,901 thousand metric tons 5,695 thousand metric tons 2,794 thousand metric tons Zimbabwe
1970s 4,514 thousand metric tons 9,070 thousand metric tons 4,556 thousand metric tons Zimbabwe
1980s 3,891 thousand metric tons 11,919 thousand metric tons 8,027 thousand metric tons Zimbabwe
1990s 4,714 thousand metric tons 15,670 thousand metric tons 10,957 thousand metric tons Zimbabwe
2000s 10,313 thousand metric tons 10,766 thousand metric tons 453.59 thousand metric tons Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total, Sudan or Zimbabwe?
Sudan, at 14,338 thousand metric tons against 8,914 thousand metric tons in Zimbabwe as of 2009.
What is the difference in co2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total between Sudan and Zimbabwe?
5,424 thousand metric tons, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zimbabwe?
46 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2009.
How do Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for co2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total?
Sudan ranks 9th and Zimbabwe ranks 11th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site, published as CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total (thousand metric tons). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sudan vs Zimbabwe: CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-total-thousand-metric-tons/sudan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-total-thousand-metric-tons/sudan/zimbabwe/">Sudan vs Zimbabwe: CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO2 emissions from fossil-fuels, total (thousand metric tons)
Unit
thousand metric tons
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization, electronic files and web site
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 2,749 data points, 1960–2009
Last refreshed

Fossil fuel is any hydrocarbon deposit that can be burned for heat or power, such as petroleum, coal, and natural gas. This is the sum total of all fossil fuel emissions (solid fuel consumption, liquid fuel consumption, gas fuel consumption, cement production and gas flaring). The U.S. Department of Energy’s carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC) calculates annual anthropogenic emissions from data on fossil fuel consumption (from the United Nations Statistics Division’s World Energy Data Set) and world cement manufacturing (from the U.S. Bureau of Mine’s Cement Manufacturing Data Set). Carbon dioxide emissions, often calculated and reported as elemental carbon, were converted to actual carbon dioxide mass by multiplying them by 3.664 (the ratio of the mass of carbon to that of carbon dioxide). Although estimates of global carbon dioxide emissions are probably accurate within 10 percent (as calculated from global average file chemistry and use), country estimates may have larger error bounds. Trends estimated from a consistent time series tend to be more accurate than individual values. Each year the CDIAC recalculates the entire time series since 1949, incorporating recent findings and corrections. Estimates exclude fuels supplied to ships and aircraft in international transport because of the difficulty of apportioning he fuels among benefitting countries. The ratio of carbon dioxide per unit of energy shows carbon intensity, which is the amount of carbon dioxide emitted as a result of using one unit of energy in the process of production.