Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Zimbabwe: Coal rents
Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.3%
in 2021
Zimbabwe
0.3%
in 2021
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
19th
Zimbabwe rank
20th
Coal rents over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0.3% against 0.3% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 200 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.8% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 0.7% | 2.1% | 1.4% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0.6% | 0.8% | 0.2% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coal rents, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Zimbabwe?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0.3% against 0.3% in Zimbabwe as of 2021.
- What is the difference in coal rents between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0%, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zimbabwe?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2021.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zimbabwe rank globally for coal rents?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Coal rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coal rents are the difference between the value of both hard and soft coal production at world prices and their total costs of production.