East Asia & Pacific vs Zimbabwe: Coal rents
East Asia & Pacific
0.5%
in 2021
Zimbabwe
0.3%
in 2021
East Asia & Pacific rank
17th
Zimbabwe rank
20th
Coal rents over time
- East Asia & Pacific
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
East Asia & Pacific currently reports 0.5% against 0.3% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes East Asia & Pacific's figure about 1.6 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
East Asia & Pacific ranks 17th and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 47 groups.
Across the 6 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.3% | 1.0% | 0.7% | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 0.5% | 1.1% | 0.6% | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 0.1% | 1.1% | 1.0% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 0.6% | 2.1% | 1.5% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.1% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.1% | East Asia & Pacific |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coal rents, East Asia & Pacific or Zimbabwe?
- East Asia & Pacific, at 0.5% against 0.3% in Zimbabwe as of 2021.
- What is the difference in coal rents between East Asia & Pacific and Zimbabwe?
- 0.2%, with East Asia & Pacific ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Zimbabwe?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2021.
- How do East Asia & Pacific and Zimbabwe rank globally for coal rents?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 17th and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Coal rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coal rents are the difference between the value of both hard and soft coal production at world prices and their total costs of production.