Eswatini vs United States Virgin Islands: Coal rents
Eswatini
0.1%
in 2021
United States Virgin Islands
0.2%
in 2020
Eswatini rank
29th
United States Virgin Islands rank
26th
Coal rents over time
- Eswatini
- United States Virgin Islands
How they compare
United States Virgin Islands currently reports 0.2% against 0.1% in Eswatini, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes United States Virgin Islands's figure about 1.5 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 29th and United States Virgin Islands ranks 26th of 200 countries.
United States Virgin Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | United States Virgin Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5% | 3.1% | 2.6% | United States Virgin Islands |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 1.4% | 1.2% | United States Virgin Islands |
| 2020s | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.1% | United States Virgin Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coal rents, Eswatini or United States Virgin Islands?
- United States Virgin Islands, at 0.2% against 0.1% in Eswatini as of 2020.
- What is the difference in coal rents between Eswatini and United States Virgin Islands?
- 0.1%, with United States Virgin Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and United States Virgin Islands?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
- How do Eswatini and United States Virgin Islands rank globally for coal rents?
- Eswatini ranks 29th and United States Virgin Islands ranks 26th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Coal rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coal rents are the difference between the value of both hard and soft coal production at world prices and their total costs of production.