Low income vs United States of America: Coal rents
Low income
0.1%
in 2021
United States of America
0.2%
in 2021
Low income rank
24th
United States of America rank
27th
Coal rents over time
- Low income
- United States of America
How they compare
United States of America currently reports 0.2% against 0.1% in Low income, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes United States of America's figure about 1.1 times Low income's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1980 it was United States of America ahead.
Low income ranks 24th and United States of America ranks 27th of 47 groups.
United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low income | United States of America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.4% | United States of America |
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | United States of America |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.3% | United States of America |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.2% | United States of America |
| 2020s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | United States of America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coal rents, Low income or United States of America?
- United States of America, at 0.2% against 0.1% in Low income as of 2021.
- What is the difference in coal rents between Low income and United States of America?
- 0.1%, with United States of America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and United States of America?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2021.
- How do Low income and United States of America rank globally for coal rents?
- Low income ranks 24th and United States of America ranks 27th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Coal rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coal rents are the difference between the value of both hard and soft coal production at world prices and their total costs of production.