Australia and New Zealand vs Polynesia: Coastal water bodies and intertidal areas — Area from CGLS

Australia and New Zealand
2,103 1000 ha
in 2019
Polynesia
453.28 1000 ha
in 2019
Australia and New Zealand rank
5th
Polynesia rank
3rd

Coastal water bodies and intertidal areas — Area from CGLS over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Polynesia
5001.0k1.5k2.0k201520172019

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 2,103 1000 ha against 453.28 1000 ha in Polynesia, a difference of 1,650 1000 ha.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 4.6 times Polynesia's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 5th and Polynesia ranks 3rd of 171 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coastal water bodies and intertidal areas — area from cgls, Australia and New Zealand or Polynesia?
Australia and New Zealand, at 2,103 1000 ha against 453.28 1000 ha in Polynesia as of 2019.
What is the difference in coastal water bodies and intertidal areas — area from cgls between Australia and New Zealand and Polynesia?
1,650 1000 ha, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Polynesia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Polynesia rank globally for coastal water bodies and intertidal areas — area from cgls?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 5th and Polynesia ranks 3rd of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Coastal water bodies and intertidal areas — Area from CGLS. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Polynesia: Coastal water bodies and intertidal areas — Area from CGLS. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/coastal-water-bodies-and-intertidal-areas-area-from-cgls/australia-and-new-zealand/polynesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/coastal-water-bodies-and-intertidal-areas-area-from-cgls/australia-and-new-zealand/polynesia/">Australia and New Zealand vs Polynesia: Coastal water bodies and intertidal areas — Area from CGLS</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Coastal water bodies and intertidal areas — Area from CGLS
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
214 places, 1,070 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Land Cover data under the Agri-Environmental Indicators section contains land cover information organized by the land cover classes of the international standard system for Environmental and Economic Accounting Central Framework (SEEA CF). The land cover information is compiled from publicly available Global Land Cover (GLC) maps: a) MODIS land cover types based on the Land Cover Classification System, LCCS; b) The European Spatial Agency (ESA) Climate Change Initiative (CCI) annual land cover maps produced by the Université catholique de Louvain (UCL)-Geomatics and now under the European Copernicus Program; c) The annual land cover maps which were produced under the European Copernicus Global Land Service (CGLS) (CGLS land cover, containing discrete land cover categorization), with spatial resolution 100m; and d) the WorldCover maps of the European Space Agency, produced at 10m resolution.