Curacao vs Namibia: Agriculture-driven deforestation
Curacao
0.7524 hectares
in 2024
Namibia
0.7338 hectares
in 2024
Curacao rank
170th
Namibia rank
171st
Agriculture-driven deforestation over time
- Curacao
- Namibia
How they compare
Curacao currently reports 0.7524 hectares against 0.7338 hectares in Namibia, a difference of 0.0186 hectares.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Namibia ahead.
Curacao ranks 170th and Namibia ranks 171st of 187 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curacao | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.3197 hectares | 139.75 hectares | 139.43 hectares | Namibia |
| 2010s | 1.62 hectares | 13.83 hectares | 12.21 hectares | Namibia |
| 2020s | 1.34 hectares | 2.03 hectares | 0.6937 hectares | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher agriculture-driven deforestation, Curacao or Namibia?
- Curacao, at 0.7524 hectares against 0.7338 hectares in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in agriculture-driven deforestation between Curacao and Namibia?
- 0.0186 hectares, with Curacao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Namibia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Curacao and Namibia rank globally for agriculture-driven deforestation?
- Curacao ranks 170th and Namibia ranks 171st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Forest Watch (2025) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Agriculture-driven deforestation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Long-term, permanent tree cover loss for small- to large-scale agriculture.