What is the difference in agriculture-driven deforestation between Equatorial Guinea and Rwanda?

326 hectares, with Rwanda ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Rwanda?

24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Agriculture-driven deforestation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Equatorial Guinea vs Rwanda: Agriculture-driven deforestation

Equatorial Guinea

1,536 hectares

in 2024

Rwanda

1,862 hectares

in 2024

Equatorial Guinea rank

67th

Rwanda rank

65th

Agriculture-driven deforestation over time

Equatorial Guinea
Rwanda

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 1,862 hectares against 1,536 hectares in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 326 hectares.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Rwanda ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 67th and Rwanda ranks 65th of 187 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Equatorial Guinea	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
2000s	370.59 hectares	725.13 hectares	354.54 hectares	Rwanda
2010s	1,314 hectares	1,301 hectares	12.83 hectares	Equatorial Guinea
2020s	1,243 hectares	1,473 hectares	229.88 hectares	Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture-driven deforestation, Equatorial Guinea or Rwanda?: Rwanda, at 1,862 hectares against 1,536 hectares in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture-driven deforestation between Equatorial Guinea and Rwanda?: 326 hectares, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Rwanda?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Rwanda rank globally for agriculture-driven deforestation?: Equatorial Guinea ranks 67th and Rwanda ranks 65th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Agriculture-driven deforestation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Rwanda: Agriculture-driven deforestation. Statizoid, drawing on Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/commodity-driven-deforestation/equatorial-guinea/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/commodity-driven-deforestation/equatorial-guinea/rwanda/">Equatorial Guinea vs Rwanda: Agriculture-driven deforestation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agriculture-driven deforestation
Unit: hectares
Source: Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage: 187 places, 4,269 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 18 September 2026

Long-term, permanent tree cover loss for small- to large-scale agriculture.