Afghanistan vs Guyana: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Afghanistan
0.4774 square meters
in 2023
Guyana
0 square meters
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
153rd
Guyana rank
156th
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Afghanistan
- Guyana
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 0.4774 square meters against 0 square meters in Guyana, a difference of 0.4774 square meters.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Afghanistan has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 153rd and Guyana ranks 156th of 178 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1226 square meters | 0 square meters | 0.1226 square meters | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 0.1312 square meters | 0 square meters | 0.1312 square meters | Afghanistan |
| 2020s | 0.3045 square meters | 0 square meters | 0.3045 square meters | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Afghanistan or Guyana?
- Afghanistan, at 0.4774 square meters against 0 square meters in Guyana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Afghanistan and Guyana?
- 0.4774 square meters, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Guyana?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Afghanistan and Guyana rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Afghanistan ranks 153rd and Guyana ranks 156th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.