Austria vs Lebanon: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Austria
4.06 square meters
in 2023
Lebanon
4.29 square meters
in 2023
Austria rank
85th
Lebanon rank
82nd
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Austria
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 4.29 square meters against 4.06 square meters in Austria, a difference of 0.23 square meters.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.1 times Austria's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 85th and Lebanon ranks 82nd of 178 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.18 square meters | 4.12 square meters | 3.06 square meters | Austria |
| 2010s | 5.91 square meters | 4.64 square meters | 1.27 square meters | Austria |
| 2020s | 4.64 square meters | 4.42 square meters | 0.2214 square meters | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Austria or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 4.29 square meters against 4.06 square meters in Austria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Austria and Lebanon?
- 0.23 square meters, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Lebanon?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Lebanon rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Austria ranks 85th and Lebanon ranks 82nd of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.