Azerbaijan vs Bulgaria: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Azerbaijan
1.74 square meters
in 2023
Bulgaria
1.82 square meters
in 2023
Azerbaijan rank
126th
Bulgaria rank
123rd
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Azerbaijan
- Bulgaria
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports 1.82 square meters against 1.74 square meters in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.08 square meters.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bulgaria ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 126th and Bulgaria ranks 123rd of 178 countries.
Bulgaria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Bulgaria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5627 square meters | 1.57 square meters | 1 square meters | Bulgaria |
| 2010s | 0.9159 square meters | 1.56 square meters | 0.6453 square meters | Bulgaria |
| 2020s | 1.08 square meters | 1.78 square meters | 0.6949 square meters | Bulgaria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Azerbaijan or Bulgaria?
- Bulgaria, at 1.82 square meters against 1.74 square meters in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Azerbaijan and Bulgaria?
- 0.08 square meters, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Bulgaria?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Bulgaria rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Azerbaijan ranks 126th and Bulgaria ranks 123rd of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.