Azerbaijan vs Croatia: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Azerbaijan
1.74 square meters
in 2023
Croatia
1.67 square meters
in 2023
Azerbaijan rank
126th
Croatia rank
128th
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Azerbaijan
- Croatia
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 1.74 square meters against 1.67 square meters in Croatia, a difference of 0.07 square meters.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Croatia ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 126th and Croatia ranks 128th of 178 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5627 square meters | 2.54 square meters | 1.98 square meters | Croatia |
| 2010s | 0.9159 square meters | 2.22 square meters | 1.31 square meters | Croatia |
| 2020s | 1.08 square meters | 1.92 square meters | 0.836 square meters | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Azerbaijan or Croatia?
- Azerbaijan, at 1.74 square meters against 1.67 square meters in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Azerbaijan and Croatia?
- 0.07 square meters, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Croatia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Croatia rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Azerbaijan ranks 126th and Croatia ranks 128th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.