Bahrain vs Cameroon: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Bahrain
15.21 square meters
in 2023
Cameroon
15.02 square meters
in 2023
Bahrain rank
18th
Cameroon rank
19th
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Bahrain
- Cameroon
How they compare
Bahrain currently reports 15.21 square meters against 15.02 square meters in Cameroon, a difference of 0.19 square meters.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bahrain ahead.
Bahrain ranks 18th and Cameroon ranks 19th of 178 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bahrain averaged higher in 1 and Cameroon in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahrain | Cameroon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.59 square meters | 10.93 square meters | 1.34 square meters | Cameroon |
| 2010s | 13.47 square meters | 9.62 square meters | 3.86 square meters | Bahrain |
| 2020s | 11.88 square meters | 16.3 square meters | 4.42 square meters | Cameroon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Bahrain or Cameroon?
- Bahrain, at 15.21 square meters against 15.02 square meters in Cameroon as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Bahrain and Cameroon?
- 0.19 square meters, with Bahrain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Cameroon?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Bahrain and Cameroon rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Bahrain ranks 18th and Cameroon ranks 19th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.