Belarus vs Philippines: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Belarus
2.94 square meters
in 2023
Philippines
2.93 square meters
in 2023
Belarus rank
102nd
Philippines rank
104th
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Belarus
- Philippines
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 2.94 square meters against 2.93 square meters in Philippines, a difference of 0.01 square meters.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Philippines ahead.
Belarus ranks 102nd and Philippines ranks 104th of 178 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.45 square meters | 3.27 square meters | 1.82 square meters | Philippines |
| 2010s | 2.42 square meters | 3.94 square meters | 1.52 square meters | Philippines |
| 2020s | 2.7 square meters | 3.27 square meters | 0.5721 square meters | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Belarus or Philippines?
- Belarus, at 2.94 square meters against 2.93 square meters in Philippines as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Belarus and Philippines?
- 0.01 square meters, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Philippines?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Philippines rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Belarus ranks 102nd and Philippines ranks 104th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.