Belarus vs Saudi Arabia: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Belarus
2.94 square meters
in 2023
Saudi Arabia
2.93 square meters
in 2023
Belarus rank
102nd
Saudi Arabia rank
103rd
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Belarus
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 2.94 square meters against 2.93 square meters in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.01 square meters.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Belarus ranks 102nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 103rd of 178 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.45 square meters | 9.82 square meters | 8.37 square meters | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 2.42 square meters | 8.59 square meters | 6.17 square meters | Saudi Arabia |
| 2020s | 2.7 square meters | 3.51 square meters | 0.8094 square meters | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Belarus or Saudi Arabia?
- Belarus, at 2.94 square meters against 2.93 square meters in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Belarus and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.01 square meters, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Saudi Arabia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Saudi Arabia rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Belarus ranks 102nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 103rd of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.