Belarus vs Sierra Leone: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Belarus
2.94 square meters
in 2023
Sierra Leone
2.84 square meters
in 2023
Belarus rank
102nd
Sierra Leone rank
105th
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Belarus
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 2.94 square meters against 2.84 square meters in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.1 square meters.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Belarus ranks 102nd and Sierra Leone ranks 105th of 178 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Sierra Leone in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.45 square meters | 1.06 square meters | 0.3924 square meters | Belarus |
| 2010s | 2.42 square meters | 3.59 square meters | 1.17 square meters | Sierra Leone |
| 2020s | 2.7 square meters | 4.01 square meters | 1.31 square meters | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Belarus or Sierra Leone?
- Belarus, at 2.94 square meters against 2.84 square meters in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Belarus and Sierra Leone?
- 0.1 square meters, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sierra Leone?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Sierra Leone rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Belarus ranks 102nd and Sierra Leone ranks 105th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.