Burundi vs Romania: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Burundi
0.8853 square meters
in 2023
Romania
0.8829 square meters
in 2023
Burundi rank
141st
Romania rank
142nd
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Burundi
- Romania
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 0.8853 square meters against 0.8829 square meters in Romania, a difference of 0.0024 square meters.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Burundi ahead.
Burundi ranks 141st and Romania ranks 142nd of 178 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.23 square meters | 1.28 square meters | 0.0516 square meters | Romania |
| 2010s | 1.39 square meters | 1.26 square meters | 0.1261 square meters | Burundi |
| 2020s | 1.14 square meters | 1.21 square meters | 0.0713 square meters | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Burundi or Romania?
- Burundi, at 0.8853 square meters against 0.8829 square meters in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Burundi and Romania?
- 0.0024 square meters, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Romania?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and Romania rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Burundi ranks 141st and Romania ranks 142nd of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.