Chad vs Indonesia: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Chad
3.28 square meters
in 2023
Indonesia
3.6 square meters
in 2023
Chad rank
98th
Indonesia rank
95th
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Chad
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 3.6 square meters against 3.28 square meters in Chad, a difference of 0.32 square meters.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 98th and Indonesia ranks 95th of 178 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.46 square meters | 11.18 square meters | 7.72 square meters | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 4.22 square meters | 14.52 square meters | 10.31 square meters | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 3.89 square meters | 5.57 square meters | 1.68 square meters | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Chad or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 3.6 square meters against 3.28 square meters in Chad as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Chad and Indonesia?
- 0.32 square meters, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Indonesia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Indonesia rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Chad ranks 98th and Indonesia ranks 95th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.