Chad vs Turkmenistan: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Chad
3.28 square meters
in 2023
Turkmenistan
3.55 square meters
in 2023
Chad rank
98th
Turkmenistan rank
96th
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Chad
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 3.55 square meters against 3.28 square meters in Chad, a difference of 0.27 square meters.
That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 98th and Turkmenistan ranks 96th of 178 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.46 square meters | 0.3601 square meters | 3.1 square meters | Chad |
| 2010s | 4.22 square meters | 0.5853 square meters | 3.63 square meters | Chad |
| 2020s | 3.89 square meters | 2.08 square meters | 1.82 square meters | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Chad or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 3.55 square meters against 3.28 square meters in Chad as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Chad and Turkmenistan?
- 0.27 square meters, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Turkmenistan?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Turkmenistan rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Chad ranks 98th and Turkmenistan ranks 96th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.