Croatia vs Cyprus: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Croatia
1.67 square meters
in 2023
Cyprus
1.57 square meters
in 2023
Croatia rank
128th
Cyprus rank
131st
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Croatia
- Cyprus
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 1.67 square meters against 1.57 square meters in Cyprus, a difference of 0.1 square meters.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.1 times Cyprus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cyprus ahead.
Croatia ranks 128th and Cyprus ranks 131st of 178 countries.
Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Cyprus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.54 square meters | 7.57 square meters | 5.03 square meters | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 2.22 square meters | 16.8 square meters | 14.58 square meters | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 1.92 square meters | 3.21 square meters | 1.29 square meters | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Croatia or Cyprus?
- Croatia, at 1.67 square meters against 1.57 square meters in Cyprus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Croatia and Cyprus?
- 0.1 square meters, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Cyprus?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Cyprus rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Croatia ranks 128th and Cyprus ranks 131st of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.