Croatia vs Russia: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Croatia
1.67 square meters
in 2023
Russia
1.75 square meters
in 2023
Croatia rank
128th
Russia rank
125th
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Croatia
- Russia
How they compare
Russia currently reports 1.75 square meters against 1.67 square meters in Croatia, a difference of 0.08 square meters.
That makes Russia's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 128th and Russia ranks 125th of 178 countries.
Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.54 square meters | 2.85 square meters | 0.3103 square meters | Russia |
| 2010s | 2.22 square meters | 3.48 square meters | 1.26 square meters | Russia |
| 2020s | 1.92 square meters | 2.09 square meters | 0.1709 square meters | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Croatia or Russia?
- Russia, at 1.75 square meters against 1.67 square meters in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Croatia and Russia?
- 0.08 square meters, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Russia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Russia rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Croatia ranks 128th and Russia ranks 125th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.