Cyprus vs Lithuania: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Cyprus
1.57 square meters
in 2023
Lithuania
1.43 square meters
in 2023
Cyprus rank
131st
Lithuania rank
132nd
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Cyprus
- Lithuania
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 1.57 square meters against 1.43 square meters in Lithuania, a difference of 0.14 square meters.
That makes Cyprus's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Cyprus has been ahead every year.
Cyprus ranks 131st and Lithuania ranks 132nd of 178 countries.
Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.57 square meters | 2.89 square meters | 4.69 square meters | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 16.8 square meters | 3.61 square meters | 13.19 square meters | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 3.21 square meters | 2.39 square meters | 0.8232 square meters | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Cyprus or Lithuania?
- Cyprus, at 1.57 square meters against 1.43 square meters in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Cyprus and Lithuania?
- 0.14 square meters, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Lithuania?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Cyprus and Lithuania rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Cyprus ranks 131st and Lithuania ranks 132nd of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.