Czechia vs Zimbabwe: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Czechia
1.8 square meters
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1.86 square meters
in 2023
Czechia rank
124th
Zimbabwe rank
121st
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Czechia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 1.86 square meters against 1.8 square meters in Czechia, a difference of 0.06 square meters.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Czechia ranks 124th and Zimbabwe ranks 121st of 178 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.06 square meters | 4.1 square meters | 1.04 square meters | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 2.8 square meters | 5.2 square meters | 2.4 square meters | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 2.29 square meters | 1.94 square meters | 0.3498 square meters | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Czechia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 1.86 square meters against 1.8 square meters in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Czechia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.06 square meters, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Zimbabwe?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Zimbabwe rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Czechia ranks 124th and Zimbabwe ranks 121st of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.