Eritrea vs Moldova: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Eritrea
4.7 square meters
in 2023
Moldova
4.6 square meters
in 2023
Eritrea rank
71st
Moldova rank
74th
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Eritrea
- Moldova
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 4.7 square meters against 4.6 square meters in Moldova, a difference of 0.1 square meters.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Moldova ahead.
Eritrea ranks 71st and Moldova ranks 74th of 178 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1955 square meters | 0.5274 square meters | 0.3319 square meters | Moldova |
| 2010s | 0.1861 square meters | 0.712 square meters | 0.5259 square meters | Moldova |
| 2020s | 2.49 square meters | 2.72 square meters | 0.224 square meters | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Eritrea or Moldova?
- Eritrea, at 4.7 square meters against 4.6 square meters in Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Eritrea and Moldova?
- 0.1 square meters, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Moldova?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Moldova rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Eritrea ranks 71st and Moldova ranks 74th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.