Eritrea vs Mongolia: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Eritrea
4.7 square meters
in 2023
Mongolia
4.83 square meters
in 2023
Eritrea rank
71st
Mongolia rank
69th
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Eritrea
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 4.83 square meters against 4.7 square meters in Eritrea, a difference of 0.13 square meters.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 71st and Mongolia ranks 69th of 178 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1955 square meters | 1.43 square meters | 1.23 square meters | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0.1861 square meters | 1.35 square meters | 1.17 square meters | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 2.49 square meters | 2.88 square meters | 0.3851 square meters | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Eritrea or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 4.83 square meters against 4.7 square meters in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Eritrea and Mongolia?
- 0.13 square meters, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Mongolia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Mongolia rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Eritrea ranks 71st and Mongolia ranks 69th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.