Estonia vs Mozambique: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Estonia
5.04 square meters
in 2023
Mozambique
4.79 square meters
in 2023
Estonia rank
67th
Mozambique rank
70th
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Estonia
- Mozambique
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 5.04 square meters against 4.79 square meters in Mozambique, a difference of 0.25 square meters.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mozambique ahead.
Estonia ranks 67th and Mozambique ranks 70th of 178 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 2 and Mozambique in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.29 square meters | 15.15 square meters | 7.86 square meters | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 19.6 square meters | 14.98 square meters | 4.62 square meters | Estonia |
| 2020s | 11.79 square meters | 6.73 square meters | 5.06 square meters | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Estonia or Mozambique?
- Estonia, at 5.04 square meters against 4.79 square meters in Mozambique as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Estonia and Mozambique?
- 0.25 square meters, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Mozambique?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Mozambique rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Estonia ranks 67th and Mozambique ranks 70th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.