Finland vs South Korea: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Finland
5.4 square meters
in 2023
South Korea
5.39 square meters
in 2023
Finland rank
64th
South Korea rank
65th
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Finland
- South Korea
How they compare
Finland currently reports 5.4 square meters against 5.39 square meters in South Korea, a difference of 0.01 square meters.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 64th and South Korea ranks 65th of 178 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.35 square meters | 7.91 square meters | 4.43 square meters | Finland |
| 2010s | 11.56 square meters | 9.79 square meters | 1.77 square meters | Finland |
| 2020s | 6.17 square meters | 5.8 square meters | 0.3701 square meters | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Finland or South Korea?
- Finland, at 5.4 square meters against 5.39 square meters in South Korea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Finland and South Korea?
- 0.01 square meters, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and South Korea?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Finland and South Korea rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Finland ranks 64th and South Korea ranks 65th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.