Georgia vs Namibia: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Georgia
6.43 square meters
in 2023
Namibia
6.23 square meters
in 2023
Georgia rank
53rd
Namibia rank
56th
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Georgia
- Namibia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 6.43 square meters against 6.23 square meters in Namibia, a difference of 0.2 square meters.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Namibia ahead.
Georgia ranks 53rd and Namibia ranks 56th of 178 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.61 square meters | 16.68 square meters | 14.07 square meters | Namibia |
| 2010s | 2.62 square meters | 32.35 square meters | 29.73 square meters | Namibia |
| 2020s | 3.92 square meters | 28.01 square meters | 24.09 square meters | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Georgia or Namibia?
- Georgia, at 6.43 square meters against 6.23 square meters in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Georgia and Namibia?
- 0.2 square meters, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Namibia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Namibia rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Georgia ranks 53rd and Namibia ranks 56th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.