Grenada vs Puerto Rico: Consumption-based deforestation per person

Grenada
0 square meters
in 2017
Puerto Rico
0 square meters
in 2023
Grenada rank
156th
Puerto Rico rank
156th

Consumption-based deforestation per person over time

  • Grenada
  • Puerto Rico
00.20.40.60.81200520142023

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 0 square meters against 0 square meters in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0 square meters.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.

Grenada ranks 156th and Puerto Rico ranks 156th of 178 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
2000s 0 square meters 0 square meters 0 square meters
2010s 0 square meters 0 square meters 0 square meters

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Grenada or Puerto Rico?
Grenada, at 0 square meters against 0 square meters in Puerto Rico as of 2017.
What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Grenada and Puerto Rico?
0 square meters, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Puerto Rico?
13 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2017.
How do Grenada and Puerto Rico rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
Grenada ranks 156th and Puerto Rico ranks 156th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Consumption-based deforestation per person
Unit
square meters
Source
Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
178 places, 3,320 data points, 2005–2023
Last refreshed

Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.