Guatemala vs Luxembourg: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Guatemala
8.7 square meters
in 2023
Luxembourg
8.38 square meters
in 2023
Guatemala rank
40th
Luxembourg rank
43rd
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Guatemala
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 8.7 square meters against 8.38 square meters in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.32 square meters.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Guatemala ranks 40th and Luxembourg ranks 43rd of 178 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.88 square meters | 21.78 square meters | 5.89 square meters | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 9.34 square meters | 25.57 square meters | 16.23 square meters | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 10.42 square meters | 20.38 square meters | 9.96 square meters | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Guatemala or Luxembourg?
- Guatemala, at 8.7 square meters against 8.38 square meters in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Guatemala and Luxembourg?
- 0.32 square meters, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Luxembourg?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Luxembourg rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Guatemala ranks 40th and Luxembourg ranks 43rd of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.