Honduras vs Singapore: Consumption-based deforestation per person
Honduras
16.67 square meters
in 2023
Singapore
16.84 square meters
in 2023
Honduras rank
16th
Singapore rank
15th
Consumption-based deforestation per person over time
- Honduras
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 16.84 square meters against 16.67 square meters in Honduras, a difference of 0.17 square meters.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Singapore ahead.
Honduras ranks 16th and Singapore ranks 15th of 178 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.41 square meters | 29.3 square meters | 4.89 square meters | Singapore |
| 2010s | 25.11 square meters | 33.17 square meters | 8.06 square meters | Singapore |
| 2020s | 19.25 square meters | 19.48 square meters | 0.2383 square meters | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Honduras or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 16.84 square meters against 16.67 square meters in Honduras as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Honduras and Singapore?
- 0.17 square meters, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Singapore?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Honduras and Singapore rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
- Honduras ranks 16th and Singapore ranks 15th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.