Lesotho vs Puerto Rico: Consumption-based deforestation per person

Lesotho
0 square meters
in 2023
Puerto Rico
0 square meters
in 2023
Lesotho rank
156th
Puerto Rico rank
156th

Consumption-based deforestation per person over time

  • Lesotho
  • Puerto Rico
00.20.40.60.81200520142023

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 0 square meters against 0 square meters in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0 square meters.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.

Lesotho ranks 156th and Puerto Rico ranks 156th of 178 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
2000s 0 square meters 0 square meters 0 square meters
2010s 0 square meters 0 square meters 0 square meters
2020s 0 square meters 0 square meters 0 square meters

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher consumption-based deforestation per person, Lesotho or Puerto Rico?
Lesotho, at 0 square meters against 0 square meters in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
What is the difference in consumption-based deforestation per person between Lesotho and Puerto Rico?
0 square meters, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Puerto Rico?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Lesotho and Puerto Rico rank globally for consumption-based deforestation per person?
Lesotho ranks 156th and Puerto Rico ranks 156th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Consumption-based deforestation per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Consumption-based deforestation per person
Unit
square meters
Source
Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
178 places, 3,320 data points, 2005–2023
Last refreshed

Estimated average deforestation for agricultural and forestry products, per person. This is adjusted for trade, so it reflects deforestation caused by consumption, not domestic production.